The answer appears to be a resounding yes. The SEC's recently filed a lawsuit against Goldman Sachs alleging fraud in the sale of mortgage-backed collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). CDOs are a structured finance product in which a large number of mortgages or other debt instruments are pooled in a trust and divided into multiple layers or “tranches” that pay interest to investors based on the risk and priority of each tranche, with the senior tranches paying lower rates because they are safer investments and the junior tranches paying higher returns for comparatively higher risk debt. The SEC alleges that Goldman Sachs created CDOs backed by high-risk subprime mortgages and then took short positions betting that they would fail while simultaneously recommending that some of their customers buy the securities. In other words, some customers were sold CDO securities and told that they were a good long-term investment, while Goldman and other customers shorted them because they were expected to go down in value. If that is true, many investors were defrauded, and they too should have the right to sue or bring an arbitration claim—especially since the SEC action has not requested restitution or recision for investors.
Continue reading "
Were Toxic CDO Investments Deliberately Dumped on Unsuspecting Investors?
" »
Posted In:
Brokerage Firms
,
Common Securities Broker Abuses
,
Credit Suisse
,
Derivatives
,
Deutsche Bank
,
Goldman Sachs
,
J. P. Morgan Chase
,
Merrill Lynch
,
Morgan Stanley
,
Mortgage Securities & Collateralized Debt Obligation Problems
,
Regulatory Developments
,
Securities
,
Securities/Commodities Arbitration
,
Securities/Commodities Litigation
,
Structured Notes
,
UBS