SEC Finds "Serious Shortcomings" At Credit-Ratings Agencies
Lack of staffing, conflicts of interest and poor business practices are among the reasons the SEC has found caused the three largest credit-rating agencies (Moody’s, S&P and Fitch) to award high credit ratings to questionable structured finance securities. Due to an unprecedented increase in mortgage-backed and structured finance securities between 2002-2007, the big three fought to keep up with volume while maximizing their own market share. In this environment, all three ended up compromising their standards and integrity.
The ratings agencies did not hire enough people when their workload began increasing in 2002. As a result, the SEC concluded that they did not have enough staff, and “sometimes cut corners.” The firms also did not document their processes or decisions in awarding “AAA” ratings (the highest rating) for questionable securities. In certain situations, there was no evidence that any surveillance work was done by the agency.
Continue reading "SEC Finds "Serious Shortcomings" At Credit-Ratings Agencies" »