Investment Fraud Lawyer Blog

Some judges are starting to question lenient settlement deals proffered by Wall Street firms and their arguably captive regulator, the SEC, according to an August 19, 2010 article in the Wall Street Journal by David Weidner called “In Search Of Justice for Wall (Street).” Two U.S. District Court Judges, Jed S. Rakoff and Ellen Segal Huvelle, have rejected settlements on the ground that the penalties were too small to be fair to the investing public. Another federal judge, Emmet G. Sullivan, threatened to reject but ultimately accepted a settlement proposed by the SEC and Barclays PLC. Judge Sullivan reportedly had earlier called it a "sweetheart deal."

Continue reading "Judges Begin to Question "Sweetheart" Securities Regulatory Settlements" »

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is investigating possible sales practice violations (e.g., misrepresentations and omissions) by Morgan Stanley, Barclays, and Credit Suisse in pitching collateralized debt obligation securities (CDOs) to institutional investors, according to a July 23, 2010 Reuters article by Steve Eder and Leslie Gevirtz, “FINRA probes M Stanley, Barclays, Credit Suisse.”

Continue reading "FINRA Investigates CDO Sales Practice Abuses by Morgan Stanley, Barclays and Credit Suisse" »

Citigroup was “negative” on subprime mortgages at least as early as 2006. Despite that, Citigroup continued to originate subprime mortgages and underwrite subprime mortgage-backed securities in large quantities. In 2007, Citigroup originated $19.7 billion in subprime mortgages and underwrote $13.4 billion in subprime mortgage-backed securities. Senior management says it did not have a clue what was going on. See April 8, 2010 article in the Huffington Post by Shahien Nasiripour, “Citi ‘Negative On Subprime mortgages As Early As 2006, Yet Firm Continued to Pump Out Subprime Mortgage Products.”

Continue reading "Citi Knew of Subprime Problems and Risks in 2006" »

Merrill Lynch hid its toxic subprime exposure inside off-balance sheet “Special Purpose Vehicles” (like one named Pyxis) until autumn of 2007 when CDO specialists at Moody’s figured it out and set off alarm bells that forced Merrill to revise its self-reported subprime exposure from $15.2 billion to $46 billion, according to an August 9, 2010 New York Times article by Louise Story, “Merrill’s Risk Disclosure Dodges Are Unearthed.” And – get this – Merrill’s senior executives supposedly did not know what was going on!

Continue reading "Merrill Lynch Concealed Subprime Risks Using Tricky Tactics" »

Citigroup has consented to charges by the Securities and Exchange Commission that it misled public investors about the extent of its exposure to sub-prime mortgage-related assets during 2007. Citigroup will pay $75 million to settle the charges, as widely reported in the financial press.

Continue reading "Citi Pays a Cheap Price for Lying to the Public - When is the SEC Going to get Serious about Fraud?" »

A United States District Court judge has ruled that a class action may proceed against Citigroup and others for making an array of material misrepresentations and omissions in public offering materials associated with bonds purchased by the plaintiffs (Reuters, “Judge Rules Bondholders Can Pursue Citigroup Suit,” July 12, 2010).

Continue reading "Bondholders Sue Citigroup for Misrepresntations Regarding CDOs and Other Toxic Securities" »

Goldman, Sachs & Co. has agreed to pay $550 million and reform its business practices to settle SEC charges that it misled investors in a subprime mortgage CDO known as ABACUS 2007-AC1, which collapsed, according to multiple articles in the Wall Street Journal, CNBC.com, and others. In so doing, Goldman admitted it made a “mistake” in failing to disclose the fact that the CDO’s investments were selected in part by a hedge fund manager who was betting on the CDO to fail. The SEC had charged Goldman and its vice president, Fabrice Tourre, with fraud. At this time, the SEC's litigation will continue against Tourre.

Continue reading "Is Goldman Getting Off Too Easy in its SEC Settlement?" »

Another member of the bewildering zoo of derivative products dreamed up and sold by Wall Street – this time a constant proportion debt obligation (CPDO) named Rembrandt – has imploded wiping out unsuspecting investors, according to a June 21 article on Bllomberg.com by Christine Harper, Shannon D. Harrington and James Sterngold, titled “Failed AAA Rated Rembrandt on Wall Street Spurs Opacity Outcry.” As the title says, Rembrandt was an opaque “black box” whose inner workings could only be modeled by computers, and so, of course, was given the highest investment grade rating of AAA. Rembrandt was reportedly linked to credit-default swaps on investment-grade companies, and lost 93 percent of its value in two years.

Continue reading ""Financial Innovation" Benefits Wall Street at Investors' Expense" »