After federal district court judge Jed Rakoff “forcefully rejected” a $285 million settlement between the SEC and Citigroup, Susan Beck bravely decided to read the prospectus for the Class V Funding III CDO at the center of the controversy, in order to see the disclosures that Citigroup says are adequate. What she found was a “brain-scrambling, obfuscating collection of words.” (“Susan Beck’s Summary Judgment: The Problem with Citi’s Disclosure Argument,” AmericanLawyer.com).
The SEC had accused Citigroup of failing to disclose to investors in the CDO that it had a role in selecting one-half of the $1 billion of assets in the deal and then bet against some of them. The investors lost $700 million while Citigroup made $160 million on the deal. Citigroup argued that its disclosures to investors were adequate, given that the investors were “sophisticated.”
Continue reading "How Citigroup Met its Disclosure Obligations: a ‘Brain-Scrambling, Obfuscating Collection of Words’" »