March 25, 2008

Investors: Beware the "Safety Net" Trap Associated with Equity Indexed Annuities and Variable Annuities

Not surprisingly, some financial advisers are more inclined to exploit a client’s fear during a bear market than during a bull market. In periods of turmoil, such advisors encourage so called “safety net” investment vehicles.

The term “safety net” is used to describe an investment that promises the upside of a market with little or no risk. In some cases, guarantees such as a minimum income or principal protection are offered. Sometimes a bonus of at least 7% of the account value is also promised when an agreement is signed.

When an advisor pitches a safety net investment, it usually involves an insurance product, e.g. equity indexed annuity or variable annuity with living benefit guarantees. The downside of safety net investments is that while agent commissions are high, returns are low - averaging about 2% to 3% annually. Also, a surrender charge or exit fee of 6% is incurred if money is withdrawn within the first six to eight years. Finally, in many cases, the promised bonus is illusory.

Continue reading "Investors: Beware the "Safety Net" Trap Associated with Equity Indexed Annuities and Variable Annuities" »

February 18, 2008

Allianz Agrees To $10.1 Million Settlement With California Insurance Regulator But Still Faces Class Action Claims

Andrew Frye of Bloomberg.com has reported that the North American subsidiary of Allianz, Europe’s largest insurer, has agreed to a settlement with California’s insurance regulator under which it will pay $10.1 million and change its annuities sales practices. California alleged that Allianz misled investors and pushed unsuitable products onto thousands of elderly persons. In a statement, Commissioner Steve Poizner noted, ``The fact that Allianz used deceptive practices and high-pressure sales tactics to lure and cajole seniors into buying unsuitable products is appalling.''

Page Perry has reviewed the California settlement document. In sum, the settlement requires Allianz to (1) pay a $3,000,000 monetary penalty, (2) pay $300,000 in attorneys fees, (3) make a $3,750,000 contribution over five years to the Life and Annuity Consumer Protection Fund special account within the California Insurance Fund, (4) make a $3,000,000 "High Impact" investment in the California Organized Investment Network, (5) establish annuity suitability systems, standards and procedures, and (6) conduct a claims review process for current or former owners of certain annuities. The claims review process will give policyholders (regardless of age) the opportunity to request rescission of their policies or receive "other specified restitution" from Allianz.

Continue reading "Allianz Agrees To $10.1 Million Settlement With California Insurance Regulator But Still Faces Class Action Claims" »

February 15, 2008

American Equity And Minnesota AG Settle Annuity Lawsuit

On February 7, 2008, the American Equity Investment Life Holding Company reached a settlement of a lawsuit over variable annuities with the Minnesota Attorney General. Hennepin County District Court Judge Kevin S. Burke approved the settlement that resolved all the issues raised in the lawsuit.

The settlement’s two primary components are (i) a defined suitability process for Minnesota consumers and (ii) a claims process for the past sales of certain variable annuity products where the senior consumers were either misinformed or received an unsuitable product.

Continue reading "American Equity And Minnesota AG Settle Annuity Lawsuit" »

February 13, 2008

Four Investment Options To Avoid

In its February 2008 issue, Smart Money magazine noted that, while the options for investing beyond mutual funds may be more attractive than in the past, there are still choices that most investors should avoid. Four such products are:

1. Variable Annuities (VAs)

Brokers and insurance companies tout the tax advantages of VAs, which grow tax free like IRAs. But distributions from VAs are taxed at ordinary income rates – roughly double the capital gains taxes that would be owed if the assets were held in a taxable account. Once you add in payments for the underlying investments and insurance protection fees, a VA could cost an investor five times as much as an investment held in a taxable account. Put $20,000 in a low-cost annuity for 20 years, for example, and you could still have earned $15,000 less than if you had made the same investment in a taxable account.

Continue reading "Four Investment Options To Avoid" »

February 12, 2008

Complex Annuity Products Make Retirement Investing Difficult

According to an article in Business Week in the Fall of 2007, equity-indexed annuities – which lets the investors share in the stock market gains with a minimal risk of loss – are getting the worst press and the most regulatory scrutiny of any financial product pitched to individual investors. Most of the regulatory scrutiny focuses not on the investment itself but on the hardball sales pitches that fail adequately to explain the fee structure, especially the early withdrawal penalties.

In 2007, attorneys general in two states filed suits against equity-indexed annuities insurers for inappropriate sales tactics. Likewise, a federal judge in Minnesota certified a class action against the largest purveyor of such annuities, Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America, for faulty disclosures. (Page Perry is serving as one of the colead counsel for the plaintiffs in that class action).

Continue reading "Complex Annuity Products Make Retirement Investing Difficult" »

November 6, 2007

Annuity Product Marketers Sidestep No-Call Lists

On October 26, 2007, the Wall Street Journal reported that insurance product marketers are tricking seniors into waiving their rights under the national Do Not Call List.  The Do Not Call law allows companies to call people on the list if they have agreed in writing to receive calls.  Because of this loophole in the law, companies that generate insurance product sales leads have mushroomed.  

It works like this.  Postcards offering information on subjects of interest to seniors are mass mailed by marketing companies to generate sales leads.  These “lead cards” are often imprinted with American flags, have a Washington, D.C. return address, and appear to have been sent by the government or AARP.  The cards often have warnings such as “changes in your Medicare benefits,” or “new legislation passed by Congress that will affect you and your heirs,” or an “AARP study found that probate taxes are hurting seniors.  They offer purportedly helpful information to those who send back the card with their contact information.  The cards do not mention that they were actually sent by a marketing company or that the recipient’s name and contact information will be sold and turned over to insurance salespeople.

Insurance salespeople use the information to sell variable annuities with high surrender charges and lengthy pay-out deferrals, and living trusts that provide no benefit to those who return the card.  They typically present themselves with trumped-up credentials such as “Senior Estate Advisor,” and employ high-pressure and misleading sales practices.  The Wall Street Journal article related a number of specific cases involving elderly people who were persuaded to invest most or all of their nest egg in complicated variable annuities that effectively locked up most of their money for years by imposing substantial charges on withdrawals. The victims were led to believe that they could withdraw their money at any time. The sales commission on such products is typically 9.5%, according to the article.

Such improper sales practices have prompted some state attorneys general to take legal actions against several of these lead generators, charging them with falsely suggesting endorsements by the government or AARP.  Regulators in as many as 20 states have opened fraud investigations.  AARP sued ChoicePoint, Inc., an Alpharetta, Georgia-based seller of personal data, and obtained a court order prohibiting Choicepoint from referring to AARP on its lead cards and from using a Washington, D.C. return address unless it had an office there, according to the article.  AARP has filed similar lawsuits against other marketing companies.

If you believe that you may have been a victim of such a scam, or were sold a variable annuity or other investment that is unsuitable for you, Page Perry, LLC may be able to help.  Our firm will review your situation and advise you on how best to proceed at no charge.  Page Perry, LLC is a nine lawyer Atlanta-based law firm with over 125 years collective experience representing investors in securities related litigation and arbitration.  Page Perry attorneys have successfully handled variable annuity and variable life insurance cases for over 20 years.  The firm is currently involved in a number of variable product cases.

October 12, 2007

Recent Developments For Allianz Policyholders

On October 10, 2007, a panel of federal judges denied a motion to centralize five Allianz class action lawsuits currently pending against Allianz related to its deferred annuity sales practices.  Plaintiffs’ counsel in two of the five cases filed the motion in the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“MDL Panel”).  Allianz, along with plaintiffs’ counsel in the other three actions, opposed the motion.  Page Perry, LLC, Chestnut & Cambronne, P.C. and the Nygaard Law Firm, co-lead counsel in the largest of the five class actions, opposed centralization on behalf of the certified class action pending in Minnesota.  Page Perry name partner Alan Perry argued before the MDL Panel on behalf of the Minnesota class in New York City on September 27, 2007.

In its Order denying transfer, the MDL Panel stated that it was not persuaded that centralization would serve the convenience of the parties or further the efficient conduct of the overall litigation.  The Panel pointed out that four of the five actions “are at a significantly advanced stage.  Classes have been certified in those four actions, and fact discovery has been completed (or is nearing completion) in three of them.”  The Panel went on to state that the “proponents of centralization have failed to convince us that any remaining and unresolved common questions of fact among these five actions are sufficiently complex and/or numerous to justify Section 1407 transfer at this time.”

Alan Perry stated, “We are pleased that the Panel recognized that centralization would not promote the efficient resolution of these different and advanced cases.” 

Also significant to some Allianz policyholders, the Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson this week reached a settlement with Allianz Life that provides the opportunity for Minnesota purchasers of Allianz deferred annuities age 65 or older to receive refunds.  

According to the terms of the settlement, Minnesotans age 65 or older who purchased an Allianz deferred annuity between January 1, 2001 and the present will receive a letter from AG Swanson giving them the opportunity to submit a claim for a refund without penalty.  For more information visit the Minnesota Attorney General’s website at www.ag.state.mn.us.

Similar to the complaint filed by Page Perry, LLC and co-counsel in early 2006, the Attorney General’s office alleged in a complaint filed in January 2007 that Allianz offered false promises of immediate bonuses to lure investors into purchasing its deferred annuities that locked their money up, in some cases, past the policyholders’ life expectancy. The Minnesota Attorney General’s settlement does not affect any of the five class actions mentioned above.

September 15, 2007

Fraudulent 'Free Lunch' Seminars Target Seniors

Federal and state regulators are investigating a widespread practice of brokers targeting seniors at “free lunch” seminars.  Regulators warn that such seminars are among the top investment scams for 2007.  Seniors and persons who may or may not be contemplating retirement are lured by complimentary meals, often at upscale hotels, restaurants, golf courses and retirement communities, and promised “educational” information with no sales pitches.  All too often, however, the brokers use the occasion to pitch unsuitable investments and retirement strategies, including cashing in their pensions, reinvesting the proceeds, retiring early, and living on the substitute paycheck from their investments that never materializes.

This is “a problem that can have absolutely devastating consequences for a large proportion of our population,” said Mary Shapiro, Chief Executive Officer of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), and Chairman of the FINRA Investor Education Foundation, in an interview.

Continue reading "Fraudulent 'Free Lunch' Seminars Target Seniors" »

September 7, 2007

Senate Holds Hearing On Controversial “Certified Senior Advisor” Titles And Allianz Life Insurance’s Annuity Sales Practices

On September 5, 2007, the United States Senate Special Committee on Aging held a hearing on Advising Seniors About Their Money:  Who Is Qualified- and Who Is Not? Senator Kohl from Wisconsin began the hearing by stating that the purpose of the hearing was to examine the growing national problem of poorly trained senior investment specialists and take the first step in much needed reform. He also stated that an investigation conducted by this committee had found that many seniors are losing their retirement income and savings by placing their trust in so-called “advisors” who in many cases may not deserve that moniker.  

The hearing focused on the controversial “Certified Senior Advisors” because the Senate investigation found that these advisors often have little to no education and no experience in extremely complicated financial matters and investment products such as equity-indexed annuities.  Senator Kohl stated that seniors should be able to trust the people who invest their money.  They should not be worried that the title after their advisor’s name is often times scarcely more than a marketing ploy and one that is not earned through a rigorous educational or financial training.

Among those who gave testimony were Christopher Cox, SEC Commissioner, Joseph Borg, the Alabama Securities Commissioner, and Lori Swanson, Attorney General from the State of Minnesota.  These regulators provided suggestions as to how annuity sales practices could be improved industry wide and advocated for the insurance companies that issue these policies to seniors to take responsibility for their agents.

Continue reading "Senate Holds Hearing On Controversial “Certified Senior Advisor” Titles And Allianz Life Insurance’s Annuity Sales Practices" »